Skip to main content

OSHRCOccupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Latest News & Information

Commission Issues Briefing Order on Houston Aquarium, Inc.

BRIEFING NOTICE   The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issue: Whether the judge erred in concluding that the diving operation at issue did not constitute "scientific diving" and was therefore subject to the requirements of the cited provisions under 29 C.F.R. Part 1910, Subpart T—Commercial Diving Operations. The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

ALJ Decision Becomes a Final Order of the Commission in Academy Roofing Corp.

DECISION AND ORDER   This proceeding is before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ("the Commission") pursuant to section 10(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. § 651 et seq. ("the Act"). As a result of an inspection of Academy Roofing Inc.'s ("Academy" or "Respondent") worksite in Concord, Massachusetts, the Secretary issued to Respondent a citation alleging a single serious violation of the fire extinguisher standard at 29 C.F.R. § 1926.150(a)(2). The citation was amended in the complaint, without objection, to allege a violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.150(c)(1)(vi). The Secretary proposed a penalty of $1,200 for the violation. For the reasons stated herein, the citation and proposed penalty are vacated.

Commission Issues Decision in BARDAV, INC.

DECISION   Bardav, Inc. owns and operates Martha's Vineyard Mobile Home Park in Corpus Christi, Texas, where two Bardav employees were injured when an excavation caved in. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration conducted an inspection of the worksite and issued Bardav three citations with fourteen items and a total proposed penalty of $50,250. The Secretary withdrew one citation item, and of the remaining items, Administrative Law Judge Patrick B. Augustine vacated five and affirmed eight, for which he assessed a total penalty of $20,675.

Commission Issues Decision in Ryder Transportation Services

DECISION   Ryder Transportation Services rebuilds starters and alternators for its vehicles at the Ryder Rebuild Center in Doraville, Georgia. Ryder hired M.C. Dean, an electrical contractor, to perform work at the Center. On August 27, 2009, an M.C. Dean employee working on the roof of the Center fell 26 feet through an unguarded skylight, sustaining fatal injuries. Following an inspection, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued Ryder a citation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, alleging a serious violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1910.23(a)(4), a general industry standard skylight provision. The Secretary proposed a penalty of $5,000.

Commission Issues Decision in United States Postal Service

DECISION   At issue on review is a citation issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to the United States Postal Service regarding two OSHA recordkeeping regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 1904.29(b)(2) and (b)(3), alleging a failure to record a work-related illness on the forms required by 29 C.F.R. Part 1904. We conclude that the Secretary has failed to prove a violation of the cited regulations; thus, we vacate the portion of the citation that relates to the alleged failure to record at issue.

Commission issues Decision and Remand Order in Heave Ho Crane Company

DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND REMAND ORDER   Before: ROGERS, Chairman; ATTWOOD and MACDOUGALL, Commissioners. BY THE COMMISSION: In an order dated August 13, 2014, Administrative Law Judge John B. Gatto found Respondent, appearing pro se, to be in default, and accordingly affirmed a one-item serious citation with a total penalty of $2,000. On September 2, 2014, Respondent filed a petition seeking review of the judge's default order. For the following reasons, we direct this case for review, set aside the judge's decision, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.