SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. OSHRC DOCKET NO. 07-0663 BURCH CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent. APPEARANCES: For the Complainant: Susan Seletsky, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Los Angeles, California For the Respondent: Robert P. Stricker, Esq., Stricker & Ball, San Diego, California Before: Administrative Law Judge: Benjamin R. Loye DECISION AND ORDER This proceeding arises under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. Section 651-678; hereafter called the “Act”). At all times relevant to this action, Respondent, Burch Construction, Inc. (Burch), was engaged in construction at the Marine Corp Recruit Depot, San Diego, California. As an employer in a business affecting commerce, Burch is subject to the requirements of the Act. On February 21, 2007the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an inspection of Burch’s San Diego work site. At OSHA’s completion of its investigation, Burch was issued a citation alleging violation of §1926.451(e)(1) of the Act. By filing a timely notice of contest Burch brought this proceeding before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission). A hearing was held in San Diego, California on December 11, 2007. Briefs have been submitted on the issues, and this matter is ready for disposition. Alleged Violation of §1926.451(e)(1) Serious citation 1, item 1 alleges: 29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used. Crossbraces shall not be used as means of access: a) Employees were using the scaffold crossbraces as a means of access from the scaffold to the top of the building. a) Travis Air Force Base Security Forces Armory Project: The Hampton Bay metal framed portable electric fan was not grounded, in that it was missing its ground pin, potentially exposing employees to the hazard of electric shock. ORDER 1. Serious citation 1, item 1, alleging violation of §1926.404(f)(6) /s/ Benjamin R. Loye Judge, OSHRC Dated: April 14, 2008