SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. WESTDALE, INC., Respondent. OSHRC DOCKET NO. 83-0601 _ORDER _ In light of Respondent's failure to respond to the Commission's Order of December 13, 1984, and the Secretary's Motion to Dismiss Direction for Review and Briefing Order of October 29, 1984, the Commission grants the Secretary's Motion to Dismiss and vacates the Direction for Review. FOR THE COMMISSION RAY H. DARLING, JR. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Dated: JAN 11 1985 SECRETARY OF LABOR, RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, Complainant, v. WESTDALE, INC., Respondent. OSHRC DOCKET No. 83-0601 _SECRETARY'S MOTION TO DISMISS DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND BRIEFING ORDER _ Comes now Raymond J. Donovan Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ("the Secretary"), and respectfully requests that the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ("the Commission") dismiss the direction for review and briefing order in the above-captioned matter. As grounds therefor the Secretary states the following: 1. As the result of an inspection of Westdale, Inc.'s ("Westdale") place of business near Flatonia, Texas on May 24, 1983 through May 31, 1983, Westdale was issued a citation on June 23, 1983, by the Austin, Texas Area Office of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor. 2. On June 27, 1983, Westdale filed a notice of contest to the citation, which was duly transmitted to the Commission by the Secretary's representative in accordance with the Commission rules of procedure. 3. On July 15, 1983 the Secretary filed a Complaint. 4. On July 19, 1983 Westdale filed an Answer to the Secretary's Complaint. 5. A hearing on this matter was held on November 2, 1983 before Commission Administrative Law Judge Louis G. LaVecchia. A post-hearing brief in letter form was filed by the Secretary. Westdale did not file a brief. 6. On March 9, 1984 Judge LaVecchia issued his Decision and Order, affirming the citation. 7. On April 9, 1984 Westdale filed a Petition for Discretionary Review of the Judge's decision. 8. On April 12, 1984 the Commission granted Westdale's petition and directed review of the Judge's decision. 9. On August 3, 1984 the Commission issued a Briefing Notice. Westdale has not filed a brief with the Commission within the forty (40) days permitted under Commission Rule 93. Nor has Westdale notified the Commission or the Secretary that it did not intend to file a brief as specifically directed by the Commission's August 3, 1984 briefing order.[[1/]] 10. In light of Westdale's failure to respond to the briefing order, the Commission should dismiss the direction for review. Cf. Culberson Well Service, No. 82-1162, 1984 CCH OSHD ¶ 26,873 (R.C. 1984). _Conclusion _ For the above-noted reasons, the Secretary requests that the Commission vacate the direction for review and allow the judge's order to become a final order of the Commission. Respectfully submitted, FRANCIS X. LILLY Solicitor of Labor FRANK A. WHITE Associate Solicitor for Occupational Safety and Health DANIEL J. MICK Counsel for Regional Trial Litigation MARY REVELL Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FOOTNOTES: [[1/]] The undersigned counsel for the Secretary spoke telephonically with Westdale's counsel, George Carlton, Jr., on two occasions, the last being October 9, 1984. Mr. Carlton indicated that he was aware of the briefing order but had not yet responded to it. In the conversation of October 9, 1984, Mr. Carlton also indicated that he would contact the undersigned after consulting with the company, but to date the undersigned has received no word from him either in writing or by telephone.