“Docket Nos. 12239; 12318; 13217; 13149; I.T.O. CORPORATION OF NEW ENGLAND; JOHN T. CLARK & SON OF BOSTON, INC.; TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.? OSHRC Docket Nos. 12239; 12318; 13217; 13149; 14382 Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission May 10, 1977 ?[*1]? Before BARNAKO; Chairman; CLEARY, Commissioner.? COUNSEL: Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL Albert Ross, Regional Solicitor Leo F. Glynn, for the employer OPINION: ORDER BY THE COMMISSION: A decision of Administrative Law Judge Ben D. Worcester vacating Complainant’s citations alleging that Respondents violated 29 U.S.C. 654(a)(2) n1 is before us for review.? Subsequent to Judge Worcester’s decision the Respondents filed a motion requesting that their notices of contest to the citations be withdrawn and that these proceedings be terminated. ?The motion serves the purposes of the Act and is therefore granted.? I.T.O. Corporation of New England, 75 OSAHRC 13\/C12, 3 OSHC 1831, 1975-76 OSHD para. 20,242 (1975), aff’d, 540 F.2d 543 (1st Cir. 1976). – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -Footnotes- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – n1 Section 5(a)(2) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq., hereinafter \”the Act\”. – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -End Footnotes- -? [*2]? – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Accordingly, the judge’s decision is set aside, and the citations and penalties proposed therefor are affirmed. So ORDERED. “