“Docket No. 80-1793 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. AMAX LEAD COMPANY OF MISSOURI, Respondent. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLC, and its LOCAL UNION 7447-J, Authorized Employee Representative.OSHRC DOCKET NO. 80-1793DECISIONBefore: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner.BY THE COMMISSION:This case involves the medical removal protectionprovision of the OSHA standard regulating occupational exposure to lead. That provision,29 C.F.R….

“Docket No. 86-0168 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. ASARCO, INC., Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 86-0168REMAND ORDERBefore: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner. BY THE COMMISSION:This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit. McLaughlin v. ASARCO, Inc., 841 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1988).In the initial decision in this…

“Docket No. 87-1522 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. ASBESTOS ABATEMENT CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 87-1522ORDERThe Commission construes the Secretary’s notice to withdrawcitation sub-items as a motion, and grants the Secretary’s motion. The Judge’s report isset aside insofar as it affirmed citation sub-items (b) and (c) of item 1, and the Judge’sreport vacating sub-item…

“Docket No. 88-2768 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. Brand Scaffold Services, Inc., Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 88-2768ORDERThe Commission construes the Respondent’s letter as a motion towithdraw the Respondent’s Petition for Discretionary Review and to vacate the Directionfor Review and grants the motion. Accordingly, Administrative Law Judge Sparks’ decisiondismissing the Respondent’s Notice of Contest and affirming the…

“Docket No. 87-0365 SECRETARY OF LABOR,Complainant,v.BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 87-0365REMAND ORDERBefore: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner. BY THE COMMISSION:This case results from the Secretary’s inspection of a trench located alongside BurlingtonNorthern’s tracks in Kansas City, Missouri. Burlington Northern’s employees wereinstalling a sewer line in a portion of the trench when it collapsed,…

“Docket No. 84-0556 SECRETARY OF LABOR,Complainant,v.CAPFORM, INC.,Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 84-0556DECISIONBefore:BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner.BY THE COMMISSION:The primary issue in this case is whether Capform, Inc., aplywood formwork subcontractor on a multi-employer construction site, violated two OSHAsafety standards alleging (1) that it failed to inspect after every rainstorm theexcavation in which its employees worked and (2)…

“Docket No. 82-0427 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant,v.CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent.OSHRC Docket No. 82-0427DECISION Before: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner. BY THE COMMISSION:This case is before the Commission pursuant to an order ofremand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Brock v. CardinalIndustries, Inc., 828 F.2d 373 (6th Cir. 1987), rev’g, 12…

“Docket No. 84-0593 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Complainant, v. CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, Respondent.UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 270, Authorized Employee Representative.OSHRC DOCKET NO. 84-0593DECISIONBefore: BUCKLEY, Chairman; AREY, Commissioner. BY THE COMMISSION:The Secretary of Labor cited Cleveland Electric IlluminatingCompany (\”Cleveland\” or \”CEI\”), a public utility providing electricityin northeast Ohio, for violating the Occupational Safety and…

“Docket No. 88-1777 SECRETARY OF LABOR,Complainant,v.CLEVELAND MARBLE MOSAIC COMPANY,Respondent.OSHRC DOCKET NO. 88-1777Before: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner. BY THE COMMISSION:JOINT DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND COMMISSION ORDERThe Respondent has filed a Petition for Discretionary Review.Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. ? 661(j) and 29 C.F.R. ? 2200.92(a), the report of theAdministrative Law Judge is directed for review, but…

“Docket No. 80-2848 SECRETARY OF LABOR,Complainant,v.COLLIER-KEYWORTH COMPANY,Respondent.OSHRC DOCKET NO. 80-2848ORDERBefore: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner.BY THE COMMISSION:The parties reached a settlement agreement during appeal proceedings in this case inthe United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The court dismissed the appealin accordance with the joint motion of the parties reciting the existence of…