ALJ Issues Significant Order in Nova Shimmick Joint Venture d/b/a Shimmick Joint Venture

This matter comes before the Court on Complainant’s Motion to Compel and for an Order for Depositions. Complainant contends Respondent did not provide sufficient responses to its discovery requests and interposed boilerplate objections without an adequate explanation of the basis for those objections. Respondent contends its responses to Complainant’s discovery request were proper; its objections were proper; and that Complainant’s requests, especially as regards the depositions, are not proportional to the needs of the case.